
Can I Support The Troops and
Criticize the Policies?
(Yes You Can)
Can
you be against the Bush administration's current foreign policy in
the Middle East and still support the troops?
First
let us look to the troops themselves. Our soldiers are among the
most intelligent in the world. These men and women are innovative
self-starters, who think quickly on a dynamic and deadly
battlefield. I was taught that our soldiers' ability to think for
themselves gives us an enormous advantage over our enemies. I was
told that if I gave my soldiers a clear objective and plan, down to
the Private they would accomplish the mission. In my career as a
soldier I met countless men and women who proved that lesson to be
true.
I say
this to say that we cannot expect our soldiers to think on the
battlefield and to stop thinking off the battlefield. When I served
in Desert Shield/Storm (Persian Gulf War), we (soldiers) discussed
why we were there. We
talked about oil interest, Saddam's past relationship with the
U.S., and Iraq’s obvious aggression when it attacked Kuwait.
I am sure similar discussions are taking place in the ranks today.
If
service women and men analyze and question current policy (usually
in private), citizens who have no sworn obligation to follow the
commander and chief will and should do so.
Second, the nation has learned a great deal from our Vietnam
experience. I think citizens and soldiers know the difference
between U.S. policy decided by politicians and the military leaders
executing that policy. Americans are ashamed of the nation’s
treatment of many Vietnam veterans. We as a country do not want to
ever treat our soldiers so badly again. Many dissenters are making
an effort to tread lightly and look for ways to dissent and not
demonize individual soldiers. This paradigm has not been fully
developed, but the will and fundamental understanding is present.
Third,
if we are to continue to be the home of the brave and an example of
freedom, we must use force judiciously, and not simply for material
and national interest. We want our soldiers to be seen as liberators
and friends, not the tools of imperialist and conquerors. We want to
love our soldiers and not fear that one day they may be used against
us.
Finally, if we as citizens value the lives of our soldiers, our
brothers, sisters, mothers, fathers, sons, daughters, and friends,
we have no choice than to examine all decisions by our government to
use military force . Our political founding fathers and mothers
created our system with what many people call a healthy distrust of
government. They believed it is the duty of the people to be active
and keep the government in check. We citizens are the fourth and
most powerful branch of government. Thomas Jefferson clearly states
this time and time again. Examples are "The ultimate arbiter is
the people of the Union," "[It is] the people, to whom all authority
belongs, " and from the Declaration of Independence,
"Governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers
from the consent of the governed." We, as citizens have a
responsibility to question and examine. It shows we are engaged in
self-government. It shows we care about our soldiers and will not
put them in harms way frivolously.
To
ensure our personal freedom and a to remain a beacon for the world,
it is imperative we are diligent in guarding against tyranny,
especially now when the U.S. is the undisputed heavy weight champion
of the world. We as Americans must guard against our tyranny over
others. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. As individual citizens,
it is our moral obligation to ensure that we the people do not allow
our new absolute status in the world corrupt us and the ideals by
which we live beyond recognition absolutely.
Source
"The ultimate arbiter is the
people of the Union." Thomas Jefferson to William Johnson, 1823.
"[It is] the people, to whom
all authority belongs." --Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1821.
"Governments are instituted
among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed." --Thomas Jefferson: Declaration of Independence, 1776.